Employment Law
A Strong Case Begins with Consistency
A right may be well established, the documents numerous, and the claim sound in principle. Yet a small difference between two amounts, an inconsistent date, or a different description of the same event may give the opposing party room that did not originally exist. In legal work, it is not enough for evidence to be abundant if it does not speak the same language.
- Author
- Lawyer Omar Al-Baghdadi
- Published
- Read time
- 1 minutes
- Updated
A Strong Case Begins with Consistency
The right may be well established, the documents numerous, and the claim sound in principle.
But a small difference between two amounts, an inconsistent date, or a different description of the same event may give the opposing party room that did not originally exist.
In legal work, it is not enough for evidence to be abundant if it does not speak the same language.
The contract, invoice, account statement, correspondence and final claim must complement one another to tell one clear story.
That is why I believe reviewing a file before submitting it is not merely a search for additional documents, but also a search for any inconsistency that could undermine confidence in the documents already available.
When a judge is faced with a coherent account supported by matching documents, understanding the case becomes easier.
But an inconsistency, even a small one, may raise a question larger than itself:
If the papers differ here, where else might they differ?
Therefore, one of the most important lessons I have learned in practice is:
A strong case is not the one containing the greatest number of documents, but the one in which no document contradicts another.
— Omar Al-Baghdadi