Legal Analysis

Not Every Settlement Is a Concession

Settlement is sometimes viewed as a retreat from one’s rights, although in some cases it may be the strongest legal decision. Litigation is not an end in itself, and a judgment is not always the best result available. A rights-holder may have a strong legal position,

Author
Lawyer Omar Al-Baghdadi
Published
Read time
1 minutes
Updated

Not Every Settlement Is a Concession

Settlement is sometimes viewed as a retreat from one’s rights, although in some cases it may be the strongest legal decision.

Litigation is not an end in itself, and a judgment is not always the best result available.

A rights-holder may have a strong legal position, yet face evidentiary risks, lengthy proceedings, or difficulties with enforcement. If it is possible to reach a settlement that preserves the substance of the right, brings the dispute to an end, and converts an uncertain outcome into a clear and enforceable obligation, settlement may then be the wiser choice.

A successful lawyer does not ask only:

Can we continue with the case?

The lawyer also asks:

What will we achieve if we continue, and what can we secure if we settle?

A considered settlement is not necessarily a concession in strategy...

It may be the success of the strategy itself.

— Omar Al-Baghdadi